anybody get crashes with BPT and GPU?
matb last edited by
@willdial If you're reducing the bucket size to 64, then you're massively utilising your GPU's capacity, and you might as well just turn BPR off and go that route. Or is there some advantage to BPR that I am missing?
@matb when you turn off BPT it also turns off sample all light direct and indirect. The result is a less accurate render. Some lights in your scene will not be calculated or reflected in glossy surfaces.
matb last edited by
@ghostship Oh really! Well this is essential information! So the recommended method of rendering in the program with many graphics cards actually produces worse quality in two different ways (micro displacement is not supported in GPU rendering either). This is very irritating.
jura11 last edited by
BPT is great if you are rendering with CPU as usually CPU is slower in rendering in Cycles/SF or any CUDA specific renderer
With BPT you don't need to have render image up to 80 samples (interior scene is good example),with BPT you can go away with 30-40 samples maybe less,didn't tried to render with BPT as I don't render with CPU in Poser and SuperFly...
I posted while back, same scene ball and HDRi map, with GPU I needed to render up to 30 samples and CPU with BPT I needed only 5-10 samples only
This is good link
There is always cons if you use CPU or GPU in many renderers
Personally I don't use at all BPT if I render with GPU, lowering bucket size is no point, renders will be slower with lower bucket size, with Maxwell generation I use 256 or 512 samples, for CPU 16-32 samples is good starting point...
Hope this helps
grubendol last edited by
I learned that without BPT oily/sweaty skin created with EZSkin3 is not properly rendered; it still looks rather matte, even if I crank up roll-off and reflection to 1. So there is a difference in the rendering result between BPT and non-BPT, although it depends on what you like best.
Before it crashed at trans-mapped hair, my test GPU BPT render produced the same skin like the CPU run, so in my opinion there is - generally - no big difference between GPU and CPU if you use the same settings (with a few exceptions like the EZDome issue).
I wonder if the GPU still cannot render volume shaders properly?
@grubendol Volume shaders seem to work fine in GPU with BPT turned off.
phdubrov last edited by
@ghostship Just to be clear: pure PT can not have setting "sample all lights...". It is impossible by design. So if you don't see light source in reflection in PT usually it is just not enough samples. For me enough can vary from 70 to 140.
@ghostship Yep, renders just black on my site here.
@Ladonna if you plug your volume shader (scatter or absorption) into the surface input you will get black. You have to plug it into the volume port on the Cycles root.
@Ladonna here rendered with three different lighting setups. two area lights, envirosphere only, enviroshere plus infinite light.
@ghostship Thanks, have to try like this. :)